Did the debate help you decide who your were going to vote for?

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

V.P. Debates Review

On March 18, the vice president candidates faced off in the little theater. Topics in debate ranged from the War on Terror to the rising concern over global warming and climate change.
Senator Bodily, the Republican nominee, received the first question from moderator Olsen on the War on Terror. Bodily answered Olsen by saying that his main problem with the war now is that there is a deadline, seemingly confusing the War on Terror and the War in Iraq. The Democratic nominee, Jessie Du Pre, continued with them of the Iraq war saying that “...regardless of the military deaths, we shouldn't force democracy on people”.
Olsen followed the trend that Bodily set and asked the candidates if they thought that the we were justified in going into Iraq. Senator Bodily responded first again, asserting that it doesn't matter why we went into Iraq and that we should remain there, but should focus more of our efforts in Afghanistan, while Du Pre simply retorted that it was not justified.
In a segue from the topic of Iraq, Olsen poses the question of troop withdrawal from Iraq. Senator Du Pre states that we should pull out immediately and passes the buck. Bodily proposes the use of benchmarks, also pushing for putting continual pressure on suspected terrorist groups, “...or else they will strike out at us”.
Next on Olsen's list was how the nominee's plan to combat terror, and whether or not they were in favor of enhanced interrogation. Du Pre vehemently condemns the act of enhanced interrogation, even on highly suspect components, yet she endorses the use of wire tapping of American citizens. Bodily, on the other hand, called for enhanced interrogation with the single reservation of “making sure that it doesn't get out of control” which seemed to be Bodily's mantra throughout the debate. He also condones the use of water boarding, as long as again, “things don't get out of control”.
Olsen then led the debate to extraordinary rendition, asking the views of nominee's on military justice in regards to P.O.W.'s. Bodily calls for the continuation of the actions at Guantanamo Bay and that we should keep all of the those prisoners that we capture. Du pre argues that humans are still human and that all of those suspected terrorist should be given a civil trial, even though they are not a citizen of this country and have been accused of committing crimes equal to that of treason.
There was then a barrage of questions from the audience which seemed to fluster both nominee's, even bringing senator Bodily to silence. After the question period, Moderator Olsen regained control to pose a final question of their views on global warming and climate change to the senator's. At this point, the bell to dismiss the students had rung, both senators answering in a quick short burst. Bodily proclaims that he believes solely in climate change, but that there simply isn't enough data to conclusively decide that we should be worried about a “global warming”. Du Pre says that no matter what is happening in the climate right now, we should move towards alternative fuel sources to lower all around costs.

2 comments:

  1. Tell us what you thought about the debates, post any questions that you didn't get to ask.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just want to defend myself here on a few of the things mentioned that I feel are in a sense a little misleading. Whoever wrote this, let me tell you that I did not get confused between the war on terrorism and the war on Iraq as mentioned at the beginning of the post. There is a deadline on the war on terrorism. It was stated by Obama during his speech to send more troops to afghanistan that 18 months from when the speech was given (2011)that the United States would pull the troops out Afghanistan. Proof of this is right here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/01/obama-afghanistan-speech-text-excerpts_n_376088.html If by chance I accidently said the 'war on Iraq' when stating this during the debate then I am sorry for this mistake and confusion but I feel that if you knew about the Afghanistan deadline, like you should, then you could infer that even with this mistake that I was still refering to the war on terrorism. The other thing I want to clarify is that I did not specifically say that we should keep all the prisoners of war. All I did was reply to a statement made by Jessie pointing out that 'The US was giving their prisoners to other nations for extreme forms of enhanced interrogation' I said after this that 'I believe this was irresponsible and that if they were our prisoners then we should deal with them and not hand them over to other countries' I never said we should permanently keep them. The third thing I want to mention for now is that if you remember, I openly spoke against waterboarding in any situation, not just when it seems like it's too out of hand. When Mr. Olsen posed the question that if it came down to a tie breaking vote for use of waterboarding, I specifically said that I would vote against it because it was too extreme of a punishment. Whoever posted this, I don't mind if you state your opinion, but don't distort everything too much.
    -Houston Bodily

    ReplyDelete